Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013

The Geography of Bliss - lessons from the unhappiest place on Earth

Eric Weiner has travelled the world to make an analysis of the most ‘happy’ and most ‘unhappy’ countries and see what the backgrounds for a nations happiness are.
And he came up with one very interesting book: The Geography of Bliss. Here the Amazon link.
Here is a brief summary of his research:
‘Extroverts are happier than introverts; optimists are happier than pessimists; married people are happier than singles, though people with children are no happier than childless couples; Republicans are happier than Democrats; people who attend religious services are happier than those who do not; people with college degrees are happier than those without, though people with advanced degrees are less happy than those with just a BA; people with an active sex life are happier than those without; women and men are equally happy, though women have a wider emotional range; having an affair will make you happy but will not compensate for the massive loss of happiness that you will incur when your spouse finds out and leaves you; people are least happy when they’re commuting to work; busy people are happier than those with too little to do; wealthy people are happier than poor ones, but only slightly.

It is extremely hard to figure out why people living in certain places are happier then others, because the reasons for our happiness are not linked to the economic situation or our income; rich country does not equal happy inhabitants and vice versa.

‘The happiest places, Eric Weiner explains, don’t necessarily fit our preconceived notions. Some of the happiest countries in the world— Iceland and Denmark, for instance— are homogeneous, shattering the American belief that there is strength, and happiness, in diversity. One finding, which Veenhoven just uncovered, has made him very unpopular with his fellow sociologists. He found that income distribution does not predict happiness. Countries with wide gaps between the rich and poor are no less happy than countries where the wealth is distributed more equally. Sometimes, they are happier… 
Many of the world’s happiest countries also have high suicide rates. People who attend religious services report being happier than those who do not, but the world’s happiest nations are secular. The United States, the richest, most powerful country in the world, is no happiness superpower. Many other nations are happier than we are.

Iceland is the perfect example of how much having friends around counts for your happiness:
‘On a practical level, Iceland’s smallness means that parents needn’t bother with that old bromide about not talking to strangers. There are no strangers in Iceland. People are constantly running into friends and acquaintances. It’s not unusual for people to show up thirty minutes late for work because en route they encountered a parade of friends. This is a perfectly valid excuse, by the way, for being late. The Icelandic equivalent of traffic was hell.

But the small population in Iceland has its disadvantages as well:
‘Geneticists have found that everyone in the country is related to everyone else, going back seven or eight generations. Icelanders can go to a website and find out how closely they are related to a colleague, a friend— or that cutie they slept with last night. One woman told me how unnerving this can be. “You’ve slept with this guy you’ve just met and then the next day you’re at a family reunion, and there he is in the corner eating smoked fish. You’re like—‘ Oh, my God, I just slept with my second cousin.’

The most interested country in its citizens’ happiness is…Bhutan! They even have a Gross National Product for a Gross National Happiness scale. Progress measured by happiness, and not by money – an approach that is very far from our consumer society

‘In a nutshell, Gross National Happiness seeks to measure a nation’s progress not by its balance sheet but rather by the happiness— or unhappiness— of its people. It’s a concept that represents a profound shift from how we think about money and satisfaction and the obligation of a government to its people.

See his opinion on America:
‘America’s place on the happiness spectrum is not as high as you might think, given our superpower status. We are not, by any measure, the happiest nation on earth. One study, by Adrian White at the University of Leicester in Britain, ranked the United States as the world’s twenty-third happiest nation, behind countries such as Costa Rica, Malta, and Malaysia. True, most Americans— 84 percent, according to one study— describe themselves as either “very” or “pretty” happy, but it’s safe to say that the United States is not as happy as it is wealthy.’

And which place is the unhappiest place on the planet, according to his study? Moldova!

See why:
‘Many countries are poorer than Moldova yet happier. Nigeria, for instance, or Bangladesh. The problem is that Moldovans don’t compare themselves to Nigerians or Bangladeshis. They compare themselves to Italians and Germans. Moldova is the poor man in a rich neighborhood, never a happy position to be in.

Not even democracy is a source of happiness for the people living in Moldova:
It’s not that democracy makes people happy but rather that happy people are much more likely to establish a democracy. The soil must be rich, culturally speaking, before democracy can take root. The institutions are less important than the culture. And what are the cultural ingredients needed for democracy to take root? Trust and tolerance. Not only trust of those inside your group— family, for instance— but external trust. Trust of strangers. Trust of your opponents, your enemies, even. That way you feel you can gamble on other people— and what is democracy but one giant crapshoot? Thus, democracy makes the Swiss happier but not the Moldovans. For the Swiss, democracy is the icing on their prosperous cake. Moldovans can’t enjoy the icing because they have no cake.

What lessons can we learn from Moldovas‘ unhappiness?
Lesson number one: “Not my problem” is not a philosophy. It’s a mental illness. Right up there with pessimism. Other people’s problems are our problems. If your neighbor is laid off, you may feel as if you’ve dodged the bullet, but you haven’t. The bullet hit you as well. You just don’t feel the pain yet. Or as Ruut Veenhoven told me: “The quality of a society is more important than your place in that society.” 


Lesson number two: Poverty, relative poverty, is often an excuse for unhappiness. Yes, Moldovans are poor compared to other Europeans, but clearly it is their reaction to their economic problems, and not the problems alone, that explains their unhappiness. The seeds of Moldovan unhappiness are planted in their culture. A culture that belittles the value of trust and friendship. A culture that rewards mean-spiritedness and deceit. A culture that carves out no space for unrequited kindness, no space for what St. Augustine called (long before Bill Clinton came along) “the happiness of hope.’
And what is the conclusion of his work?

‘Money matters, but less than we think and not in the way that we think. Family is important. So are friends. Envy is toxic. So is excessive thinking. Beaches are optional. Trust is not. Neither is gratitude.

I just love this book! Read it!

Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013

Hungry Planet: What the World Eats

On the banks of Mali's Niger River, Soumana Natomo and his family gather for a communal dinner of millet porridge with tamarind juice. In the USA, the Ronayne-Caven family enjoys corndogs-on-a-stick with a tossed green salad.

A couple traveled the world exploring how the eating habits differ from country to country and presented their results in a photo album, called Hungry Planet: What the World Eats

As it is very visual, you are directly confronted with obvious social issues. The album shows the differences around the world, the divison of lifestyles all across the globe. It is easy to see that, as a paradox, the more money we spend on food, the poorer the quality of that food is. People who spend more money on food it more processed products, while fresh and healthy ingredients never see their plate.



How much money do you spend on food? And what kind of food do you eat in the end?

Mexico, Cuernavaca

The Casales family spends around $189 per week.

Ecuador, Tingo

The Ayme family spends around $32 per week.

United States, Texas

The Fernandezes family spends around $242 per week.

Guatemala, Todos Santos

The Mendozas family spends around $76 per week.

United States, North Carolina

The Revis family spends around $342 per week.

Canada, Iqaluit

The Melanson family spends around $392 per week.

Italy, Palermo

The Manzo family spends around $295 per week.

Cuba, Havana

The Costa family spends around $64 per week.

China, Weitaiwu

The Cui family spends around $65 per week.

Kuwait, Kuwait City

The Al-Haggan family spends around $252 per week.

Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sarajevo 

The Dudo family spends around $90 per week.

Egypt, Cairo

The Ahmed family spends around $78 per week.

Australia, Riverview

The Brown family spends around $428 per week.

Germany, Bargteheide

The Melander family spends around $568 per week.

Mali, Kouakourou

The Natomo family spends around $30 per week.

Canada, Gatineau

The Finken family spends around $158 per week.

India, Ujjain

The Patkar family spends around $45 per week.

Japan, Kodaira City

The Ukita family spends around $361 per week.
For more images and information check out the Hungry Planet book.
Pictures from boredpanda.com

Dienstag, 30. April 2013

Where did the normal people go?

After a couple of very challenging days, to put it mildly, I cannot help but wonder if there are still any people left in our environment, or if we only have ‘The System’.

In our try to be more and more efficient, we have created ‘The System’. You want to register/ deregister/ make a change in your data: ‘Sorry, it is not possible, we have already saved the data in The System’. Or, at your hotel, you stand in front of the reception and tell them you want to prolongue your stay: ‘Sorry, it is not possible; we have already deregistered you in The System’. Or you want to pay cash but you realize you don’t have enough money, so you decide to pay by card: ‘Noooooo, I have already registered a cash payment in The System’. And so on and so far….we are always revolving around this System. Instead of being more flexible, we get more and more bureaucratic, we have created systems over systems which have started to rule our daily lives.  
It does not matter anymore if you stand in front of someone and communicate something – if it is not in the system, it does not exist. We only analyze the data in our system – what happened to direct communication or just picking up the phone and discussing a topic? Since when does everything need to be in a System?
Everywhere you go, regardless of what you have to do, you have to face a System.  Even if you pick up your laundry and stand in front of the laundry employee explaining that you had one more jacket, which is now missing, he/ she will convince you that you didn’t because….it is not in The System!!
So I am wondering, when did all the people disappear? When did their brains and normal, healthy thinking get replaced by a System? When has life become so complicated?
Every day we get confronted with The System, talk to robots and buy stuff from machines, if we have a problem, we have to talk to a robot for half an hour until our call gets re-routed to Dave, in India, who will most definitely assure us that our request is now registered in The System and will be handled shortly.
I am fed up with The System, I would like to be able to have normal conversations with normal people who listen to what I say, and not to what is registered in some System.
But I guess that all the delightful events are just a warm welcome to the era of the Homo Sistematicus…

Donnerstag, 25. April 2013

The new generation of workaholics

Yesterday I read again an article about the ‚workaholism‘ in Romania – according to Eurostat statistics, Romania is under the top 3 when it comes to the sum of annual working hours. I must not say that the situation is not really directly proportional to the economic situation or income of the active working population. But this is something we already know – more means not better.

Still, the new generation of workaholics is constantly increasing, as statistics show. When I still worked in Romania, I kinda felt bad when leaving the office after ‘only’ 8 hours of work…working long overtime and feeling exhausted has become some kind of national ‘pride’ among young people. It is normal not to have a good relationship, or a relationship at all, not to have time to go to the gym, to eat in front of the computer, not to have any real hobbies, not to spend time with your friends and drink your brains out on weekends because…remember, you don’t have any other hobby.
This should not be our reality and thinking that you can’t change anything about it is false! People should not work longer than 8 hours a day, and definitely not spend more than 10 hours a day in the office. It is not normal to do overtime just because you can’t step up to your manager and say that the workload is too high for the existing headcount. There is always a solution…but why bother looking for one, when you still have enough workaholics around that do the job just fine? Why hire 8, when you can make your 4 employees work on weekends and give up their holidays? If only we would not be so afraid of….of what, actually? If everybody would change their attitude towards life, and acknowledge that there actually is a life after work, then the employer – employee relationship could shift. The working environment is always shaped by the two parties, not only by the multinational employer who does not care at all about who you are or what you do.
Why has it become normal to sacrifice your best years for company X? In order to prove what? Of course, it is difficult to stand up and leave the office at a reasonable hour, while the rest of your colleagues is getting ready to sleep in the office. Of course that it will shed a bad light on you, regardless of the fact that you have done your job great. This is a collective problem, it needs rethinking from the grounds and a change can only be done if everyone changes attitude.
Our parents already gave up a big part of their personal lives, to work for the communist ‘collective wellbeing’, there is no need to keep up this tradition. I have found a working environment where people are happy, relaxed, work normal hours, have really cool hobbies and can take their vacation days yearly – and guess what, the company still works. They still make profit, they still have a sustainable growth strategy and no, there are no sweatshops in 3rd world countries. Reality has shown that it is possible to work and live at the same time.
I hope I will see the same in Romania in the near future…I hope people will not sell their abilities, skills, time and best years for 500 – 600 EUR a month anymore! Every single one of us can change the market, we are not a low-skill country and therefore should we not be a low-wage one either!

Montag, 8. April 2013

Oas Country - Country of contradictions

'What good is it to have money, if you can't show it?'
There are a lot of stories cruising about Tara Oasului, a region from Satu Mare county. I think that it is one of the most controversed regions in Romania, due to the contrasts that shock you from the second you arrive.

I am glad to see that the development of Oas has been captured in a captivating project, called Pride and Concrete. If you want to get a glimpse into Oas and if you want to understand why the people from Oas work so hard abroad ('cause they do work hard), what drives them and what keeps them coming home, no matter where they have travelled, take some time to visit  Pride and Concrete (romanian version: Mandrie si Beton).

Get to know a different side of the story!



Donnerstag, 4. April 2013

Crowdsourcing – using the ideas of the world

After all of the brains in a company have been stormed, and no WOW-idea has been born throughout the process, maybe it is time to use all the ideas that are outside your company’s doorstep.

Instead of having one or two people doing the job, come up with an idea, you can now outsource it to a large group of people outside the company – you can reach into the minds of so many people! The term ‘crowdsourcing’ was first coined in 2006, but the rise of the crowdsourcing platforms has only been more significant in the past 2 years.

The best people to offer you feedback on your ideas or products, the best to suggest improvements or innovations are your customers – or potential customers. Instead if investing resources into analyzing what your customers’ needs or wishes might be, why not ask them? This is the solution to a successful launch of any product or service: involve your customers from the beginning of your creation process, ask them for feedback, listen to their ideas and they will feel like part of your idea, hence more prone to buying it. Instead of facing them with a final products or service, and afterwards investing huge amounts of money into convincing them that they need what you have just served there, let them be part of your story.
It is effective, it is cheap, it is fun and it is a win-win situation for all parties involved.

Famous Example: Wikipedia. Instead of Wikipedia creating an encyclopedia on their own, hiring writers and editors, they gave a crowd the ability to create the information on their own. The result? The most comprehensive encyclopedia this world has ever seen.

Crowdsourcing’s biggest benefit is the ability to receive better quality results, since several people offer their best ideas, skills, & support. Crowdsourcing allows a company to select the best result from a sea of ‘best entries,’ as opposed to receiving the best entry from a single agent. Results can be delivered much quicker than traditional methods, since crowdsourcing is a form of freelancing, using online platforms. Companies can get a finished video within a month, a finished design or idea within a week, and microtasks appear within minutes.

In return, the people providing their ideas, get promotional articles from the companies, small gifts, or even a small reward payment. The ROI is higher than in any traditional method.
To get some information on crowdsourcing platforms and how they work, you can visit:

If you want to read about several successful crowdsourcing ideas, here is an inspirational list:

Mittwoch, 27. März 2013

One City, One Book

Just imagine standing in the metro in the morning, going to work, reading your book between stations – you look left, you look right - and all around you there are people reading the same book as you. Strangers – but you know you have at least one thing in common – you are all reading the same book. I think that would be a great feeling and would create an instant sense of community. 

I do not know if you ave heard of the ‚One City, One Book‘ initiative, but I just loved the idea the second I heard about it. It is quite old, as it started in 1998 in Seattle under the title ‘If All of Seattle Read the Same Book’. The point is that, during one month of the year, an entire city should read the same book. People can vote in advance on a website and choose the book they want to read – afterwards they can attend different book clubs, readings or meetings to discuss the book or just to meet new people. Nowadays it is even easier to advertise the idea via social media – just image what we could create.
In a big city, characterized by anonymity, a simple book can bring so many people together… We pass by so many people every day – wouldn’t it be great to know that we all have at least ONE thing in common? That we are all lost between the pages of the same book?
I would love to organize such a project, so if anyone is interested, please contact me J

A great example is Dublin!